Even Steven. Skill has value.
An excavator at a treeline in winter, snow on the ground
Why it is different

Built for you, and why nothing else is built this way.

You own your skill, always and forever, and nothing here takes it, buys it or learns it out of you. You license a record of how you work, you are paid every hour it is in use, your name stays on it, you can check the count, and you can end it for nothing. Every part of that is the reverse of the clause you have most likely already been shown, and this page sets the two side by side.

What we are doing

You license a record of how you work, and you are paid every hour it runs.

Even Steven is built for the person who runs the machine. An instrument, meaning the agreement, the roster and the pay that sit underneath somebody else's machine, lets you license a record of how you work, be paid every hour it is in use, keep your name on it, see the count and take it back. A repository where that record is held under your name and licensed by name. And the family's own crews, on home ground, first.

The instrument

Your skill stays yours, and a record of it earns while you are doing something else.

Nothing here stops you working, teaching, bringing on apprentices, or going somewhere else tomorrow. We never ask for that and we would not take it. What you license is a record. A person runs the machine as they always have, a recorder watches from outside it, wired to nothing, and a photograph of that state goes into the record. The record carries what their hands did, what the machine did back, and what they were looking at when they acted, on one clock, in one signed chain, and it carries their name by design.

A way of working is the name here for how a named person runs a machine once it has been recorded, admitted and built. From admitted sessions we build a way of working, away from the machine, and a named person signs the release. What we build is a tool, and it runs under your name. Before a job, a person on the crew picks whose way of working runs, by name, and that pick is the clearance and the start of the count. You see the hours as they are written and you are paid for them. Give notice and nothing new starts under it.

A winter corridor from the air, a dozer working a graded strip through bush with snow either side
Patent pending

The way a session is captured, and the way a record is released to a machine and counted, are the subject of patent applications now pending. It is the reason this site says what is recorded and what runs, and not how.

What we make

The agreement.

Five promises, each written against its counterpart on our side: your skill stays yours, paid every hour it works, your name on it, you can end it, and you can check the count. The rate is on the covenant, and this page does not repeat it.

The covenant
Where it is held

The repository.

Even Steven's door on the Tacit Tessera register, where a way of working is held under the name of the person it came from and licensed by name, and never a store owned by whoever sells the machines. The person whose way of working it is opens their own record there. A listing is a named way of working, for the family of machine it was taught on, and no way of working is blended with another on the machine.

The repository
Where it starts

Home ground first.

The crews at home go first, before anyone else is asked, and where each piece stands has a page of its own.

Where this stands
In plain words

If you want it in plain words, seven short pages go over the same ground in the words a crew uses, for reading at the end of a shift. They run in order, from what a tacit skill is to what a machine that learns does with a record of one.

A tacit skillHow it is capturedWhere it is keptWhat a machine does with itOver the yearsMachines that learn
What everyone else does

One signature, one payment, a house name, and no way out.

None of this describes one company. It describes the clause you have most likely already been shown and the arrangement underneath it, and each part of it is usual because it is the easy way for the party that wrote it.

Consent

A signature buried in the equipment contract.

Permission to record the person in the seat is a clause in the paper that came with the machine. Whoever bought the machine signed it, it covers every use at once, and nobody in the seat has read it.

Payment

A one-time fee, or nothing at all.

Where there is money at all it is paid once, for the day, and the record earns for somebody else for as long as it runs. Where there is a share instead, it is a share of somebody's net, and the person has no way to see the net.

The name

An anonymous composite under a house name.

The way of working goes into a blend with everyone else's and comes out under a product name or a version number. Nobody can point at the part that was yours, so nobody has to credit it.

Ending it

A term that renews, and no way out.

A term that renews unless you catch it, a penalty for leaving, and a record that lives on somewhere after you have gone, because nobody kept track of where it went.

The count

A count nobody outside can check.

The party that owes the money counts the hours, on a system nobody else can read, and sends a statement. The statement is the count, and if you doubt it the cost of checking is yours.

The register

A register owned by whoever sells the machines.

Where a store exists it belongs to whoever sells the machine or the kit, and it favours what they sell. The person in the seat comes where they fall.

Who decides

Software that decides, and calls it a setting.

Fitted, ready, and moving, with nobody's name on the decision. The person in the seat finds out what it decided afterwards, and the paperwork calls the decision a setting.

People

People ranked by a number.

If a record can be scored, somebody will score it. Nothing here is scored, and the section below says why not. On soft ground the score picks the quick one, right up until the quick one is in the water.

A low-ground-pressure dozer in the yard, blade down, side on
The last step

Everything up to the last step exists somewhere.

The step that has never been built is paying the named person for the hours their way of working ran.

Why nobody has built this

Machines have always written down what they did, and nothing about who was in the seat.

Recording exists. Learning from a record exists. The step that has never been built is the last one, paying the named person for the hours their way of working ran, and the reasons it was never built are the reasons this instrument is shaped the way it is.

  1. 01
    A machine writes down what it did, and nothing about who was in the seatA machine's own record is full of its own state all day and empty of the decision not to move, the look at the bank before the bucket went in, and the name of the person who made both. Anything built from that record alone learns the machine and not the person. So the record here carries what their hands did, what the machine did back, and what they were looking at, on one clock. And it carries the person's name, because a way of working with no name on it could not be licensed, credited or paid for.
  2. 02
    Every attempt to pay people for what they know has failed, or dropped the paying partOther people have tried to pay for what a worker knows. Mostly the money ended up with a few, or the checking cost more than the payment, or the record got kept and the paying part quietly went away. The ones that have held kept each person's contribution a separate thing that could be pointed at, counted and taken back. So the count here is kept in sessions, each with its own identifier and signature, and a session is what you take back when you end it.
  3. 03
    The law protects an artefact, and never a techniqueCopyright protects expression rather than method, and a way of cutting a slope or bringing a process back into band is not an authored work. Nobody can own a technique, and we do not pretend to. What can be built is a payment obligation and a licence: the recording is information about an identifiable person, privacy law attaches consent and withdrawal to that directly, and the entitlement to be paid is created by the agreement itself. Paying a person for the use of what they know, rather than for owning it, is an older idea than it looks, and it is the side of the line with ground under it.
  4. 04
    The trades nearest to it built the skill into the machine insteadWhere an industry has met a hard skill, it has mostly engineered it out of the seat, and the person's way of doing it left the job with nothing paid for it. We went the other way. The person stays in the seat, the machine stays as it was, and a record of the way of working is what is licensed, under the person's name, for as long as they choose.
  5. 05
    A count kept by the party that owes the money is the count trusted leastEvery count anyone has built shows that a record was kept, and nothing about whether the party keeping it had reason to tell the truth. So the count is not ours to keep and not ours alone to read. It is kept in the Tacit Tessera register, the money is owed by us, and the two are deliberately not the same hand. It is written on the record that shows who cleared the work, the owner reads the same hours on the same record, and you have an accounting and a right to audit it.

Everything up to the last step exists somewhere. The last step is paying the person, by name, for the hours their way of working ran, and it is the step this instrument is built around.

Why now

The seat is becoming recordable, and whoever records it first sets the terms.

For as long as there have been machines, what a person knew about running one lived in the person and went home with them at night. That is ending. The machines are learning how you work, with you or without you. A way of working can now be recorded, checked, built into something a machine carries, and run again in another seat. Somebody is going to do that, on your machine or the one beside it, and the question is whether you are asked, paid and named when they do.

It will be recorded

A machine can be taught from the seat now, and the people who sell machines know it. Most of what is called AI learned from people who were never asked and never paid, and if you do not trust it, you have good reason. The question is no longer whether a way of working gets recorded. It is what happens to the person afterwards.

The terms are set early

The first arrangements written for this will be the ones everything after them is measured against. Written by whoever sells the machine, they look like the usual arrangement above. Written the other way round, they look like the covenant.

These are written the other way round

The person is asked, named, paid every hour it is in use, able to see the count and able to leave, and the skill stays theirs. The instrument that does that stands apart from anyone who makes machines, and it is patent pending. The family's own crews, on home ground, are where it runs first.

The way of working that walks out the door at retirement is about to be worth money to somebody. This is built so that the somebody is the person it came from.

What a machine that learns is given, in plain words
The differences, one by one

The usual arrangement and the covenant, side by side.

Each difference below is carried by a sentence from the covenant or from the page it links to. Read the left column against the clause you were shown, and the right column against the covenant.

The usual arrangement

One signature, buried in the equipment contract.

One signature covers recording, blending, licensing and training at once, given by whoever bought the machine, and it is read when somebody complains.

Under the covenant

Consent comes apart, and it is checked when the recording happens.

It is not one signature. It is separate agreements, each given on its own and withdrawn on its own, so you can say yes to one and no to another and the no is honoured without emptying anything else. A session made while the agreement covering it was not live is refused, and the reason says so. A record used to train a model is a different thing, and it is asked for on its own.

The covenantMachines that learn
The usual arrangement

AI, the usual way: it learns from you, and you were never asked.

Most of what is called AI was taught on what people made and did, and the people were not asked, not paid and not named. You have seen how that goes. A machine taught from the seat the same way learns your way of working out of you, and you find out when it is running somewhere else, under a house name, for nothing.

Under the covenant

Asked, paid, yours.

You are asked, one agreement at a time, and a no is honoured. You are paid every hour your way of working is in use. Your name is on it, and you can end it. Nothing is learned on the machine, and nothing is learned from a session you did not admit. A record used to train a model is a different thing with a yes of its own, and what that would pay is not written yet, so nobody is asked for it until it is. The people who wrote this run machines, and are old enough to distrust AI too. The machines are learning. Even Steven keeps it fair and square.

Machines that learn
The usual arrangement

A one-time fee, or nothing.

A fee once, or a share of somebody's net that the person has no way to see, or nothing at all, while the record earns for somebody else for as long as it runs.

Under the covenant

Paid every hour it works, at a ceiling that is published.

No lump sum and no handshake. A share for every hour your way of working is in use, for as long as it is. You are paid because you kept the original. The rate is on the covenant, and this page does not repeat it.

The covenant
The usual arrangement

An anonymous composite under a house name or a number.

Blended with everyone else's and run under a house name or a number. Nobody can point at the part that was yours, so nobody has to credit it or pay for it.

Under the covenant

Your name on it, and nothing runs under a house name; no number takes the place of yours.

If a machine is working your way, it says so. The name is the point, and it stays attached to you. A listing in the repository is a named way of working, for the family of machine it was taught on, and no way of working is blended with another on the machine.

The repository
The usual arrangement

A term that renews, a penalty for leaving, and no way out.

The clause runs for a term, the term renews unless you catch it, leaving costs money, and nobody kept track of where the record went, so nobody can say when it is gone.

Under the covenant

Ending it is free, and the dates we give you are true.

Give notice and nothing new starts under it. A job already underway finishes, because stopping a machine mid-pass is its own hazard. No penalty, no clawback, no fee for walking away. A right that costs money to use is not a right. Deleting every copy takes longer than taking it out of service, because backups run to a horizon. Two dates, and the later of them is the one that means every copy, backups included.

What a withdrawal obliges us to do
The usual arrangement

A total on a statement, from the party that owes you.

A total arrives from the party that owes it, worked out where you cannot see. A count that only one party can see is an invoice.

Under the covenant

You can check the count against the record that shows who cleared the work.

The count is kept in sessions, and each one carries its own identifier and signature. You see the hours it worked and what you are owed, and you can check both against the record that shows who cleared the work. The count is kept in one record that both sides read, so you get an accounting and a right to audit it. The owner paying reads the same hours on the same record.

The count
The usual arrangement

Bought outright, once, and sold on whole.

The record is bought for a fee, the buyer owns it outright, and the collection can be sold flat, whole, to whoever comes next, with the people in it going along as an asset.

Under the covenant

We never buy it, and the whole is never sold flat.

There is nothing there to acquire. You own your skill. You license a record of how you work, and what we build from that record is a tool: it runs under your name, on your licence, it pays you every hour, it passes to your family, and you can end it. We make the tool. You own the skill. The shape is the one recorded music already uses, and it is set out on what it is. A change of ownership should be a reason to withdraw, on its own.

What it isWhose it is
A row of machines standing behind a fence in the yard
The usual arrangement

The rights sit with whoever is paying.

The employer arranged the recording, so the employer holds the consent, the right to end it and the say over where it goes. The person in the seat, with the least room to say no, has the least say.

Under the covenant

Your protections travel with you, not with whoever is paying.

The right to withdraw, the true deletion date, and the right to know what is recorded belong to the person in the seat, and not to the person who arranged the recording. A way of working you taught your employer's machine stays with that employer. It going anywhere else takes a fresh agreement, signed by you. It is still counted, still paid and still yours to end. Where a body speaks for the crew, it signs as well, rather than being worked around.

If it is your way of working
The usual arrangement

Software that decides.

The system is fitted, the system reports ready, and the system moves. Whether it should have moved is a question for afterwards, and the answer is a setting.

Under the covenant

A way of working proposes. It never authorizes.

The software is last in the order, and nothing moves it up. A way of working is software. Fitted and ready are states a machine can reach on its own. Cleared to work is a person's word, given on the day. Before every job a person on the crew picks whose way of working runs, by name, and puts their own name on the choice. No default and no last-used.

Safety
The usual arrangement

Wired in, and left on.

The kit is spliced into the machine and it stays there. It can be reached from somewhere else, and whether it is connected on a given day is a box ticked in software.

Under the covenant

Nothing of ours is connected while a person works, and the photograph shows it.

No harness cut, no controller touched, no power taken off the machine. It cannot move a machine and it cannot stop one, so it is not an interlock and it is not a guard, and no part of any safety case rests on it. It comes off, photographed before and after, and leaves no mark. A box ticked in software is a claim software makes about itself. A photograph of the disconnected state, carried inside the record where it cannot be swapped out quietly, is a claim a person made and can be held to.

How it is recorded
The usual arrangement

Ranked, scored and rated.

A number sorts the list, the top of the list gets the work, and the number is what is sold. On a good day the careful operator and the quick one look the same on it, and on the other days it picks wrong.

Under the covenant

Asked for by name, and never ranked.

Nothing sorts one name above another, because inside a family there is no first. On blind, wet or soft ground every measure you could rank by turns on you. A record can show a day where nothing went wrong. A score cannot. We do not sell one operator's record against another's. A skill does not have to be the best in the country to be worth keeping. It has to be yours.

The trades
The usual arrangement

A register owned by the people who sell the machines.

The register is owned by the maker of the machine or the maker of the kit, so it favours the iron, and the person in the seat comes where they fall.

Under the covenant

Not kept by the people who sell the iron.

Even Steven keeps its own name, its own papers and its own count. An instrument that counts the hours and pays the person has to be read by both sides, not kept by whoever makes the machine that runs it. Its worth to you rises with that independence, and so does its worth to the owner paying, because a count kept by the people selling the iron is a count kept for the iron.

Company
The usual arrangement

Tried on somebody else's crew first.

The first people recorded are customers, the awkward questions are found on their site, and the terms are written afterwards around whatever was found.

Under the covenant

The family's own crews, on home ground, go first.

The first recordings come from crews we already work with, on machines they already run. The procedure that admits or refuses a record runs on us before it runs on anyone else. We are working it out on the family's own people first, so the awkward questions are found by us and not by you.

Where this stands
An excavator and a tractor parked in the yard at dusk
On the crew

A person on the crew clears every job.

Fitted and ready are states a machine can reach on its own. Cleared to work is a person's word, given on the day.

What it costs us

Every protection on your side has a cost on ours, and the cost is written down.

Every protection on your side is held up by something it costs us, and each of those costs is written down below. The test each clause has to pass is whether it would still be acceptable if the two sides swapped places.

We own the recording, and it still answers to you

The recording of you working is made of your skill and it is information about you. It belongs to Even Steven and to nobody else, and it is held for you: used for what you said yes to and nothing wider, carrying your name, paying you every hour anything made from it is in use, and out of service when you say. Owning it buys us none of your skill, and a permission you can withdraw at will is harder to write than a transfer would have been.

You can walk, and the cost of it lands on us

Ending it is free on your side. On ours, the way of working comes out of service, we find everything that saw your work, we delete the raw and the derived alike that we hold, and we tell you the true date, backups included. Where material went into a model under a learning or a derivative licence, it comes out at that model's next revision and that date is stated before you agree, because nobody here will tell you a model has forgotten you. A right that costs money to use is not a right, so the money sits on our side of it.

A buyout would be cheaper, and we refuse it

Paying once and owning the record outright would cost us less than paying every hour for as long as it runs. We refuse it, because an instrument that took the technique outright would extinguish the reason to keep paying you, and with it the reason anyone would take part.

The count is checkable against us

The count is kept in one record that both sides read, so you get an accounting and a right to audit it. That is not generosity. It is the arrangement we would need in your position, and we would not accept a different one in ours.

Nothing of ours can be the reason a machine moved

A way of working proposes and never authorizes. The claim gets made for things like this, by people who would like to sell you one, that the software can be trusted to decide. We do not make it, on purpose. A person on the crew clears every job, and their name is on the clearance.

What we keep is the tool

What we build from your admitted sessions is a tool, and the tool is what we keep. It runs under your name, on your licence, it pays you every hour, and it does not run without your name on it. You cannot take the finished article to somebody else and sell it. Every line on your side has a line on ours holding it up, and the two columns are the same length.

A protection with no counterpart is a favour, and favours get taken back.

Fair is fair

The test and the table
What we are not

It makes nothing that moves, hires nobody, grades nobody, sells nothing on, and buys nothing.

Things like this get taken for other things, and each of the other things is something we refuse to be.

Not a robot maker

Nothing here moves.

Even Steven makes nothing that moves. It is the agreement, the roster and the pay that sit underneath somebody else's machine. The machine stays the maker's, and the controls stay as they were.

Not a staffing agency

Nobody is hired and nobody is sent to your site.

You are not hiring a person for the day and nobody is sent to your site. What is licensed is a way of working, and a person on your own crew still says go.

Not a scoreboard

Nothing here grades how somebody works.

The checks a session goes through are about equipment and paperwork, and no check anywhere grades how you worked. A record is not supplied for discipline, and nobody is ranked, scored or rated from one.

Not a data broker

A record goes nowhere without the person's yes.

A session is information about an identifiable person. It goes nowhere without their yes, and whoever licenses a way of working cannot pass it to anybody else. Nothing is sold on, and no recording is sold as such.

Not a sale

We never acquire a person's technique.

There is nothing there to acquire. You license a record of how you work, what we build from it is a tool that runs under your name and pays you every hour, and an instrument that took the technique outright would extinguish the reason to keep paying you.

Not a safety device

It is not an interlock, a guard or a stop.

It does not make a machine faster and it does not run a site without people. It proposes. A person authorizes, on the day, every day, and no safety case should be written with any part of it resting on us.

A skid steer in the yard, side on
Home ground

Our own crews on our own ground go first.

The first recordings come from crews we already work with, on machines they already run.

Where it starts

On home ground, with the crews who already run it.

This company makes nothing that moves.

The ground is home ground and the crews are the family's, so the first awkward question is asked of us. A cut face that has to stay up, a corridor pushed through bush in winter, a causeway built out into open water, a pit floor taken down in bands to a line on a drawing: work where the careful operator is the one a crew asks for again. It is the ground this instrument was written for, and the excavator is the seat it starts in, because it is the machine the crews sit in, on home ground, doing work that is often blind.

Short answers

For the owner, the operator and the people who can say no.

If you own the machines

You are not buying a technique and you are not hiring a person. You license a named way of working for the family of machine it was taught on, a person on your crew picks it by name before the pass, and that pick is the clearance and the bill. You see the hours, and so does the person being paid. The skill stays your operator's, and the tool you license runs under their name. The most an hour costs is on the covenant.

If it is your way of working

Your skill stays yours. You license a record, you are paid every hour it is in use, your name stays on it, you can end it for nothing, and you can check the count against the record that shows who cleared the work. Your protections travel with you, not with whoever is paying, and your own record is yours to open. What it earns outlives the days you are in the seat, and it passes to your family.

Safety officer

Every difference on this page is on paper. None of it changes who says go.

Legal and procurement

A payment obligation and a licence, not an ownership claim. Consent is separate agreements, checked at the moment of recording. Ending it is free, with two true dates. The agreements go on the covenant page in plain words before anyone is asked to sign one.

If you have been offered the usual arrangement, show us the clause.

Write with the clause in front of you, and we will show you what the covenant says on the same point. What that means for your position is for your own counsel.